Re: 4th draft up -- get your comments in!
От | Bernard Clement |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 4th draft up -- get your comments in! |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200510071254.49937.bernard.clement@b2b2c.ca обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 4th draft up -- get your comments in! (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: 4th draft up -- get your comments in!
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Josh, My pinch of salt about the usage of "enhanced" and "improved". You can also used "better" and "superior". All those 4 words are synonyms. IMHO, it is not too bad to use a certain word twice and I will let be like it is. Bernard PS Hoping that my message will go through...I do not remember with which email address I subscribed. On Friday 07 October 2005 12:40, Josh Berkus wrote: > Lance, > > > Only one nitpick. In the features section, we twice say the feature is > > for 8.1. That seems implied to me. I recommend dropping the clause > > "for 8.1" in "the buffer manager for 8.1 has..." and "in version 8.1," in > > "in version 8.1, the query planner is ..." > > OK, I'll take a look. I'm a little more concerned about the fact that > I use the words "enhanced" and "improved" at least 6 times each, and > "refactored" twice. Bonus points for anyone who can find ways to > replace some of these! > > Also, Lance, I thought I had an "about Pervasive" on file, but I don't > seem to. Can you get me the 4 line version? Thanks! > > --Josh > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: