Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200510071121.01696.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thursday 06 October 2005 18:18, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 12:40:49PM -0700, CSN wrote: > > --- Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com> wrote: > > > Federated Storage Engine: Allows MySQL to access > > > tables in other > > > servers like they are here. No real direct > > > equivalent in PostgreSQL, > > > but dblink provides similar functionality. > > > > Would that be possible with table partitions? Or > > Slony? > > Slony would give you a loose approximation. Table partitioning is > unrelated. Better yet, I don't know of any reason why you can't define a > view using dblink that would duplicate the features of a federated > system. Of course it would be easier if it was in the back-end... You can, but if the view runs against a large table you're screwed since pg can't optimize complex queries into the inital query to set up the view. Not sure if my$ql is any smarter about this, but that's the first thing to look for if you were to investigate how well it worked. -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: