Re: Announcing Veil
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Announcing Veil |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200510070356.j973uKN12189@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Announcing Veil (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Announcing Veil
Re: Announcing Veil |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> I'd be willing to add the proposed patch in 8.1 (style note: > >> NUM_USER_DEFINED_LWLOCKS should be set in pg_config_manual.h not > >> lwlock.h). > > > Shouldn't it be something we can put in postgresql.conf? > > No more than any of the other entries in pg_config_manual.h. > With only one known request for a user-allocated lock, it's hard to > justify the overhead of a GUC variable. True, but are people going to recompile PostgreSQL to use this feature? Seems they would have to. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: