Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20051006221234.GK36108@pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? (Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 09:10:53PM +0200, Dawid Kuroczko wrote: > On 10/6/05, Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com> wrote: > > > > Views: Similar functionality, but PostgreSQL has updatable views by the > > DBA writing simple rules that allow it. This means that for simple > > updatable views, MySQL wins for ease of use, and for complex updatable > > views, PostgreSQL wins because you can still do them, you just get to do > > it yourself. > > > Hmm, maybe it would be worth a while to add (or rather move) a section > about programming updatable views between "The Rule System" and > "Procedural Languages". The point could be called: > > "Updatable Views Using Triggers" > > This would make it much easier for beginners to find the subject, and also > would make easier to support "yes, we do have updatable statements, only > its not automated" statement with just a link to right point in > documentation. > > In short: make it more visible. ;) s/triggers/rules/, but I agree. It would be great to have a prominent, succinct example of creating an updateable view. I think there's something close in the docs currently, but you have to dig through a pretty big chapter to find it. I don't know that it makes sense to promote it to 34 (putting it in the TOC), but I do think it should be linked from the CREATE VIEW syntax page. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: