Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20051006210324.GQ28948@phlogiston.dyndns.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas ("Aly S.P Dharshi" <aly.dharshi@telus.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 01:19:33PM -0600, Aly S.P Dharshi wrote: > Okay that is a fair statement to make, hence restating: > > - What is the status of those items listed on the PostgreSQL gotchas Some of them are for sure gotchas. For users of tranditionally-non-toy (as opposed to recently-non-toy) systems, I'd think that there are three serious issues: the column alias (because it strictly violates the SQL definition), the folding to lower case (same reason), and the UNICODE==UTF-8 issue (because it violates the UNICODE definition). > - Are they valid statements ? > - If they are bugs are they resolved ? Some of them are valid and resolved (the site actually notes as much in many cases). One thing I do note is that there's a workaround for the have-to-dump issue: you can use Slony to upgrade (by design). It won't work for everyone, but it's a big step up in many cases. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca "The year's penultimate month" is not in truth a good way of saying November. --H.W. Fowler
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: