Re: Maximum # of schemas
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Maximum # of schemas |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20051004135145.GY40138@pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Maximum # of schemas (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 11:27:29AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Steve Manes <smanes@magpie.com> writes: > > Questions: is there a hard limit to the number of schemas you could have > > in a database? > > No. > > > Are there any caveats/pitfalls/pitbulls to having a > > large number of duplicate schemas in a database? > > If that also implies a large number of tables, you might start to run > into filesystem-level bottlenecks due to having a large number of files > in the same directory. If you aren't using a filesystem that copes > gracefully with huge directories, you probably want to avoid having more > than a few thousand files per directory. (As of PG 8.0 you can work > around this to some extent by segregating tables into different > tablespaces.) Some of the "\ commands" in psql will also get slow. I've seen this for a database with 4000 tables. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: