Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
От | Martijn van Oosterhout |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20051004100441.GC17589@svana.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 10:51:32PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > > Basically, I recommend adding "-Winline -finline-limit-1500" to the > > default build while we discuss other options. > > I add -Winline but get no warnings. Why would I use -finline-limit-1500? > > I'm interested, but uncertain as to what difference this makes. Surely > using -O3 works fine? Different versions of gcc have different ideas of when a function can be inlined. From my reading of the documentation, this decision is independant of optimisation level. Maybe your gcc version has a limit higher than 1500 by default. -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a > tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone > else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: