Re: Release, 3rd draft
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Release, 3rd draft |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200510031245.05739.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Release, 3rd draft ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Release, 3rd draft
Re: Release, 3rd draft |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Jim, > If we're going to go with 2pc, it should be 2PC IMO. But I think it > would be better to spell it out (two-phase ocmmit). Oh, right, missed that. > New Advanced Features, para 2: > s#INOUT#IN/OUT# Really? I thought the technical term for the 3 types of params were IN, OUT, and INOUT. > The table partitioning section is a bit misleading in that it doesn't > actually help with large tables, it just makes partitioning a bit more > effective. Suggested replacement language? > On the BSD/GPL horse, what about... > > PostgreSQL is distributed under a BSD license, which unlike GPL licensed > software, allows use and distribution without fees for both commercial > and non-commercial applications. I am *NOT* picking a fight with the FSF. Also, many people (myself included) do not agree with MySQL's draconian interpretation of the GPL. This would get us headlines, all right, but the wrong kind. -- --Josh Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: