Re: 64-bit API for large objects
От | David Fetter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 64-bit API for large objects |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050923223220.GD4164@fetter.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 64-bit API for large objects (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: 64-bit API for large objects
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 05:40:09PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Jeremy Drake <pgsql@jdrake.com> writes: > > The real problem here is that int64 isn't a well-defined portable > datatype, and so it's going to be very hard to export these > functions in a way that won't break on different platforms, > applications compiled with a different compiler than libpq was, etc. > > For that matter, we can't even guarantee that they work at all: not > all platforms even *have* int64 types. We have so far avoided > putting any fundamental dependencies on int64 arithmetic into the > system, and I'm a bit worried that this patch will break LO support > entirely on platforms that don't have working int64 arithmetic. What platforms that PG supports don't have int64 arithmetic? Cheers, D -- David Fetter david@fetter.org http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778 Remember to vote!
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: