Re: logging blemishes
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: logging blemishes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200509221533.j8MFXoh02536@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: logging blemishes (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > >Are you saying "connection received" should honor %q? It seems it is a > > >session line, rather than a server line, no? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe, the line just struck me as rather ugly. Never mind. > > Now that you mention it, the log line for connections does look wrong. > "[local]" doesn't have remote port numbers like tcp does. The remote > port is the same number as the server port. I am thinking we should > suppress the 'port=' output for local connections. We properly suppress > the port number in parentheses for log_line_prefix='%r'. Done. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: