Re: shared Locks
От | Martijn van Oosterhout |
---|---|
Тема | Re: shared Locks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050920093343.GB8586@svana.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | shared Locks (Daniel Schuchardt <daniel_schuchardt@web.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: shared Locks
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 11:18:48AM +0200, Daniel Schuchardt wrote: > So if we want to change a table structure (add a field or sth like this) > many clients own AccessShareLock's because it seams that a simple SELECT > * FROM table will grant a AccessShareLock and don't release it unitl the > connection is terminated. Is that true? Is it is possible to release > this lock without a disconnect? {Problem is that about 30 users has to > disconnect sometimes. :-( } I think you'll find that locks are held to the end of the transaction. You're not holding a transaction open but not doing anything, are you? Otherwise, provide an example including output of pg_locks. Hope this helps, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a > tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone > else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: