Re: Time to start the PR machine
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Time to start the PR machine |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200509192031.42905.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Time to start the PR machine ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Time to start the PR machine
(Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42@gmail.com>)
Re: Time to start the PR machine ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Greg, > No, I'm not yet, but feel free to set me up (username: turnstep). Of > course, I'm also a big fan of email as we can discuss ideas without > actually committing them. Hmm - I could see a good use of subversions > property tagging for something like that... You're added. SVN will have to wait, though. > I always learned it was a grammar thing, and that the serial comma should > always be included to prevent ambiguity. Even Strunk and White says so. > The only place that omits them anymore is US newspapers, and even there it > is finally dying out. Since this is a global press release, I say we add > that final serial comma in, and weather the storm of angry newspaper > editors. ;) Well, it's not a grammar thing; it's a style thing. However, I don't care that much personally, so I'm fine with putting them in if other people care. > "8-way, 16-way, dual-core, and multi-core servers." Sounds good to me. One of my primary reasons for mentioning it at all is as a not-very-subtle way of saying "Hey! PostgreSQL runs on high-end hardware!" > I was thinking of plural "bitmap scans" at the start, but it reads well > either way. But it definintely is two words - we even use "bitmaps" alone > in the paragraph, which emphasizes that this is a specific type of scan. > Note that we say "Bitmap Heap Scan" and "Bitmap Index Scan" in our > EXPLAIN output... Hmm ... so "Bitmap Scan" then as the name of the feature? > Just wanted to COA by asking this before someone else outside the community > does. Yes. I figure the "up to" protects us some. > This is the second major version with full native Win32 support. The > previous version saw over 1 billion* downloads for the Windows platform. > > * Someone check that figure Try 700,000. > > >> Mention the new options available (bizgres, enterprisedb, etc.) even if > >> only generically? > > > > Hmmm ... suggest wording? > > Dunno. Could be tricky to tie it into 8.1 specifically. Yes. Let me know if inspiration strikes. > Thanks for the feedback. This release is coming along a lot smoother than > the last one. Experience. > Do we also have a draft of the other release yet? No, I'm waiting to see the official Coverity report. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: