Re: AGE function
От | Michael Fuhr |
---|---|
Тема | Re: AGE function |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050907062634.GA14474@winnie.fuhr.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | AGE function (Louise Catherine <r1c4n@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: AGE function
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 10:05:06PM -0700, Louise Catherine wrote: > When I execute this statement : > select AGE(TO_DATE('20041101','yyyymmdd'), > TO_DATE('19991201','yyyymmdd')) > > at postgre 7.3.3, the result : > age > --------------------- > 4 years 11 mons 1 day > > at postgre 8.0.3, the result : > age > --------------- > 4 years 11 mons > > My question : > 1. How does postgre 7.3.3 calculate AGE function? > 2. Why the result produced by postgre 7.3.3 > is different from postgre 8.0.3 ? I get the same answer ("4 years 11 mons") in 7.2.8, 7.3.10, 7.4.8, 8.0.3, and 8.1beta1. Have you verified that to_date() is returning the correct dates? What are the results of the following queries on each of your systems? SELECT TO_DATE('19991201','yyyymmdd'), TO_TIMESTAMP('19991201','yyyymmdd'); SELECT TO_DATE('20041101','yyyymmdd'), TO_TIMESTAMP('20041101','yyyymmdd'); SHOW TimeZone; What operating system are you using? Prior to 8.0, PostgreSQL relied on the system's timezone files; as of 8.0 it has its own timezone database. I don't know if that matters, but it's one difference between 8.0 and previous versions that might be relevant to the problem. BTW, it's "PostgreSQL" or "Postgres," not "postgre." -- Michael Fuhr
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: