Re: pgsql: Implement a preliminary 'template' facility for procedural

On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:50:49PM -0300, Tom Lane wrote:
> Log Message:
> -----------
> Implement a preliminary 'template' facility for procedural languages,
> as per my recent proposal.

Yay!

> For now the template data is hard-wired in proclang.c --- this
> should be replaced later by a new shared system catalog, but we
> don't want to force initdb during 8.1 beta.

Wouldn't beta be the time to do it?  I know we define initdb-forcing
changes to mean a major version bump, but I also thought that beta was
a time to find the places where such changes make sense.  Has there
been a guarantee that beta means "no initdb" in previous releases?

Just my $.02.

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david@fetter.org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100   mobile: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!