Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050902145445.GC18258@surnet.cl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT (Matt Miller <mattm@epx.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 02:34:50PM +0000, Matt Miller wrote: > > > Rewriting all my Oracle code function-by-function could be painful > > > ... > > > I'm still trying to hold on to my fantasy that I can hack Postgres (and > > > contrib/ora2pg) into submission. > > > > Why don't you just use EnterpriseDB? > > I looked at EnterpriseDB a few months ago. The installation errored. > It left stuff in /var/opt, which I consider non-standard for a Red Hat > machine. The whole product just didn't feel clean to me. I admit > that's a pretty limited and subjective evaluation, especially for a beta > product, but I was in the mode of broadly evaluating alternatives, so I > moved on. Maybe I need to look at it again. Well, the EnterpriseDB has much more support for Oracle syntax in general, and PL/SQL in particular. If you didn't get past the installation step, certainly you didn't have a feel of how the real features work. May I suggest you at least get it working and try to port your functions to it? (Disclaimer: while I work for EDB, I haven't had any relationship to the Oracle-PL/SQL layer yet, nor have I been involved at all in their commercial offering.) -- Alvaro Herrera -- Valdivia, Chile Architect, www.EnterpriseDB.com "Having your biases confirmed independently is how scientific progress is made, and hence made our great society what it is today" (Mary Gardiner)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: