Lance Obermeyer wrote:
> Oh, so we can, with a reasonably straight face, say something like
> this. "This 1m downloads over the last six months compares to the
> last month of 7.4, which had <x> downloads.
If we had historical logs, which I gather we might not, we could make
claims that a certain release was downloaded N times more often than
another one, which would be an interesting number. But giving out
absolute numbers is just laughable, considering the mirror network, the
redistributors, their mirror networks, and a host of other factors that
make the absolute download numbers from the primary FTP server
completely out of proportion with reality. I would guess that we have
at least 100 times more installations than downloads from the primary
FTP server, factoring out that not every download leads to a unique
installation.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/