Re: Certification and SRA
От | Robert Bernier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Certification and SRA |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200508261427.40911.robert.bernier5@sympatico.ca обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Certification and SRA (Chris Travers <chris@travelamericas.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Certification and SRA
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On August 26, 2005 01:00 pm, Chris Travers wrote: > >The second fact that I want to bring up concerns PostgreSQL certification > > itself. The challenge we face is that at this time there is no community > > derived certification for PostgreSQL..... how we develop a standard that will be of high quality and accepted by thecommunity? > How many people are interested in participating? How do we get people > to participate? STEP ONE: debate the merits of creating a standards organization on this mail list This I think is job 1. There's going to be respectful disagreement and I'd like to hear from everybody on this. I'm pro standardsgroup, especially after seeing how well the BSD Certification Group have done their work. STEP TWO (assuming there's enough consensus AND only minor disagreement): assemble a team creating a standards organization STEP THREE: get this team on chat and hash out the nitty gritty. I can ask the BSD Certification chair to sit in on a chatsession and tell us their experiences. > Will bsdcertification.org actually prepare their own certification > exams? Or will they have other companies do it? Companies are being encouraged to run their own testing/certification infra-structure. The BSD Certification Group has takenthe position that competition is good. What they want is to create a set of standards that others will use. Maybe CompTIAwould be a valid example here. If you can, I encourage to glance through the survey results but read the roadmap thoroughly. Every idea or issue that youcan imagine regarding certification standards was covered (at least it sure seems that way).
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: