Re: Read/Write block sizes
От | Michael Stone |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Read/Write block sizes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050823232424.GM8667@mathom.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Read/Write block sizes (Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 06:09:09PM -0400, Chris Browne wrote: >What we have been finding, as RAID controllers get smarter, is that it >is getting increasingly futile to try to attach knobs to 'disk stuff;' >it is *way* more effective to add a few more spindles to an array than >it is to fiddle with which disks are to be allocated to what database >'objects.' That statement doesn't say anything about trying to maximize performance to or from a disk array. Yes, controllers are getting smarter--but they aren't omnicient. IME an I/O bound sequential table scan doesn't get data moving off the disk nearly as fast as say, a dd with a big ibs. Why? There's obviously a lot of factors at work, but one of those factors is that the raid controller can optimize "grab this meg" a lot more than it can optimize "grab this 8k". Mike Stone
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: