Re: enable_constraint_exclusion GUC name

pgman wrote:
> Is enable_constraint_exclusion the proper name for this feature?  I know
> we have enable* in the optimizer settings, but that naming seems
> unfortunate in that we should have just called it hash_join and it could
> be enabled/disabled.
> 
> I am thinking we should just call it constraint_exclusion.

So, given the silence on this, I assume people think we should rename
this before beta starts.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073