Re: Field order
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Field order |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050817224034.GO95876@pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Field order (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>) |
Ответы |
Re: Field order
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 03:24:58PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 12:09:12 -0600, > Michael Schmidt <MichaelMSchmidt@msn.com> wrote: > > I've searched the archives and found this question was asked in 2001 but never answered. Does the order of fields ina table make a difference? In Paradox (from whence I come), there was some belief that reliability was increased if memo(text) fields were placed at the end of the table. If field order does make a difference, does the EMS PostgreSQL manager"reorder" function physically rearrange the fields? > > > > Thanks for your time in considering this basic question > > Some space can be saved by putting the columns with the largest alignments > first. > The columns are not moved around to do the above, but are kept in the > declared order. Ugh, and here I'd been doing it the other way around. I assume variable-length stuff should always go last, right? This make sense? Variable goes last, always Larger alignment before smaller NOT NULL before nullable -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: