Re: gettime() - a timeofday() alternative
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: gettime() - a timeofday() alternative |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050817220718.GL95876@pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: gettime() - a timeofday() alternative (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 06:24:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Brendan Jurd <direvus@gmail.com> writes: > > Regarding the statement_timestamp() ... if the entire query path is > > parser -> rewriter -> planner/optimiser -> executor, what point in > > that path would be considered the true start of the "statement"? > > IIRC, what we actually intended that to mean is the time of receipt of > the current interactive command --- that is, it gets set in the > postgres.c outer loop, not anywhere in the parser/etc path. Otherwise > there's not a unique answer (consider statements issued inside SQL > functions for instance). ISTM that it would be useful to be able to use timestamp_statement within a function though... although I guess timestamp_clock might suffice in most cases. Another consideration is that this is a potential source of confusion; people could easily think that timestamp_statement would operate the same inside a function as it would outside. Would it be reasonable to add one more timestamp that works the same inside and outside a function? In either case, can anyone think of a less-ambiguous name for timestamp_statement? -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: