Re: EnterpriseDB - what happens to pgsql?
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: EnterpriseDB - what happens to pgsql? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200508121000.29709.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | EnterpriseDB - what happens to pgsql? (Robert Cleary <robert.cleary@ul.ie>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Robert, > Just wondering what the general concencus is about enterpriseDB from the > pgsql community? good or bad? Good. (my perspective) > Is there a danger that users new to databases, will skip pgsql > alltogether and use edb's free version > or have i missed something obvious here? Well, I (and other SFPUG community members) just finished 3 days of promoting OSS PostgreSQL from a "pod" in the EnterpriseDB pavillion at Linux World Expo. (more about that later) We were distributing "dual" CDs, with PostgreSQL/PGAdminIII and EnterpriseDB/eDBStudio on them. eDB fills a nice niche, for people who are looking to migrate to a more cost-effective alternative to Oracle, but still want corporate support, licenses, glossy marketing materials, etc. For folks who want an OSS database that they can hack and re-distribute with their own stuff, they'll still use "regular" PostgreSQL. Also, don't forget that eDB is just the latest in our family of companies. We've quite a few companies who have carved out "niches" reselling PostgreSQL to particular markets, just as the various Linux resellers serve their own markets: Fujitsu, SRA, Pervasive, Command Prompt, GreenPlum, and even at one time Red Hat. And as much as people keep saying that Red Hat is going to become the Linux monopoly, I've not seen any sign of it happening yet. So I'm not worried. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: