Re: EnterpriseDB - what happens to pgsql?
От | Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum |
---|---|
Тема | Re: EnterpriseDB - what happens to pgsql? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050811223535.23e8727b.adsmail@wars-nicht.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: EnterpriseDB - what happens to pgsql? ("Denis Lussier" <denis@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:41:01 -0400 "Denis Lussier" <denis@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > - The Postgres community is incredibly rich and diverse. It's getting > ever stronger and momentum is gaining for the worlds most advanced > open source database. We're proud to be a part of this massive > collaborative effort that is bigger than any individual, company, > country, or continent. PostgreSQL has a good community, we only need to spread the "most advanced database" part a little bit so that more people will know and take care. It does not help to have a good product/software, people have to use it to make it successful. > - We are trying to provide an increasing amount of functionality that > helps free Oracle (and other proprietary DB vendors) customers from > vendor lock-in and exhorbitant pricing. Can this be a bad thing?? Since this is, what PostgreSQL is also doing (increasing functionality): no, this could not be a bad thing at all. Kind regards -- Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with your Microsoft product. (Ferenc Mantfeld)
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: