Performance pb vs SQLServer.
От | Stéphane COEZ |
---|---|
Тема | Performance pb vs SQLServer. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050811131911.3175A1C0031B@mwinf0401.wanadoo.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Performance pb vs SQLServer.
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hi, I have a perfomance issue : I run PG (8.0.3) and SQLServer2000 on a Windows2000 Server (P4 1,5Ghz 512Mo) I have a table (3200000 rows) and I run this single query : select cod from mytable group by cod I have an index on cod (char(4) - 88 different values) PG = ~ 20 sec. SQLServer = < 8 sec the explain is : HashAggregate (cost=64410.09..64410.09 rows=55 width=8) -> Seq Scan on mytable (cost=0.00..56325.27 rows=3233927 width=8) if I switch to "enable_hashagg = false" (just for a try...) the planner will choose my index : Group (cost=0.00..76514.01 rows=55 width=8) -> Index Scan using myindex on mytable (cost=0.00..68429.20 rows=3233927 width=8) but performance will be comparable to previous test. So with or without using Index I have the same result. Thanks for help. Stéphane COEZ
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: