Re: What's up with EnterpriseDB?
От | David Fetter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What's up with EnterpriseDB? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050811005433.GB13973@fetter.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What's up with EnterpriseDB? ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
EnterpriseDB mentioned in eweek, and...
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 03:42:59PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Tony Caduto wrote: > >I saw their announment today and they said they have Oracle > >compatiblility. > > > >What exactly does this mean? They don't go into any details. Did > >they implement a Oracle compatible proc language or something? > > I don't know the full details but my understanding is they > implemented things like IN/OUT parameters and a superset of pl/SQL. I spoke with them today at LWE/SF. They have a subset of PL/SQL (no packages yet, but they're working on it for A Really Big Client) and are able to do in-line anonymous PL/SQL blocks. I'm hoping we can talk them into helping us do in-line anonymous PL/Foo based on what they've done for this. :) Cheers, D -- David Fetter david@fetter.org http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778 Remember to vote!
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: