Re: Publishing and PostgreSQL
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Publishing and PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200508102218.24637.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Publishing and PostgreSQL (Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Publishing and PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Tom, Jonathan, Folks, > This is preaching to the choir, but it'd be great if some more books on > PostgreSQL appeared. I've got the pink O'Reilly one (Practical > PostgreSQL?) but it's getting pretty long in the tooth... Actually, the big problem with PostgreSQL books is not lack of demand but lack of authors. I've had requests from a number of publishers, and our own book (me & Joe) is running behind due to overwork. Finding database book authors period is hard, because the people most qualified to write database books generally don't have time to do so. The MySQL community, for whatever reason has done a good job of promoting qualified people to write. So what I'm saying is that nobody can criticize ORA for not publishing Postgres books when they're not getting any proposals. If anyone reading this thread would *like* to be a postgreSQL book author, e-mail me, I'll hook you up (not necessarily with O'Reilly). BTW, Jonathan, I get the feeling that Bookscan results (for some reason) only cover about 20% of sales for tech books. At least, I was able to check royalty statements with couple of authors, and they indicated that the authors sold at least 4x what BookScan reports. Does this match ORA figures? -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: