Re: PL/Perl list value return causes segfault
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PL/Perl list value return causes segfault |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200507300324.j6U3Ob713189@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PL/Perl list value return causes segfault (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: PL/Perl list value return causes segfault
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Would someone who knows perl update plperl.sgml and send me a patch? Also, is this still true in 8.1: In the current implementation, if you are fetching or returning very large data sets, you should be aware that thesewill all go into memory. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > David Fetter wrote: > > >On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 03:45:55PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > > > >> > >>In perl, if there is any ambiguity it is the called function that is > >>responsible for checking, not the caller. See "perldoc -f > >>wantarray". PLPerl explicitly passed G_SCALAR as a flag on all > >>calls to plperl routines. So returning a list is a case of pilot > >>error. > >> > >> > > > >Is this a kind of pilot error that documents could help avert in some > >useful way? > > > > > > > > > > Sure. "A plperl function must always return a scalar value.More complex > structures (arrays, records, and sets) can be returned in the > appropriate context by returning a reference. A list should never be > returned." Salt to taste and insert where appropriate. > > cheers > > andrew > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to > choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not > match > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: