Re: [GENERAL] MySQL to PostgreSQL, was ENUM type
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] MySQL to PostgreSQL, was ENUM type |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050729194954.GE95931@decibel.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] MySQL to PostgreSQL, was ENUM type (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] MySQL to PostgreSQL, was ENUM type
Re: [GENERAL] MySQL to PostgreSQL, was ENUM type |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 12:53:07AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Gregory Youngblood <pgcluster@netio.org> writes: > > ... the problem is unsigned bigint in mysql to postgresql. > > There's not another larger integer size that can be used that would > > allow the 18446744073709551615 (is that the max value?) max value > > available in mysql. Or am I missing something? > > You'd have to translate that to NUMERIC, which would work but would > take a bit of a performance hit ... Is there any serious impediment to adding unsigned types to PostgreSQL? They should be as readily supported as signed, right? I don't think these would even have to be in core, if that's a concern. -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel@decibel.org Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: