Re: ORDER BY
От | mark@mark.mielke.cc |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ORDER BY |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050725225438.GA20944@mark.mielke.cc обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на |
ORDER BY |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 06:11:08PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Just curious as to whether or not a warning or something should be issued > in a case like: > SELECT c.* > FROM company c, company_summary cs > WHERE c.id = cs.id > AND cs.detail = 'test' > ORDER BY cs.fullname; > Unless I'm missing something, the ORDER BY clause has no effect, but an > EXPLAIN shows it does take extra time, obviously ... Why would it have no effect? If there is a one to many mapping between fullname and id, and if the rows in c with the same fullname have different rows in c.*, then it does matter. For the casual observer, only seeing the output of the table, they would see a consistent reporting order, but would be unable to derive how the table rows were sorted. :-) mark -- mark@mielke.cc / markm@ncf.ca / markm@nortel.com __________________________ . . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder |\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ | | | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all and in the darkness bindthem... http://mark.mielke.cc/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: