Re: ORDER BY
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ORDER BY |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050725220027.GZ29346@decibel.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на |
ORDER BY |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 06:11:08PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Just curious as to whether or not a warning or something should be issued > in a case like: > > SELECT c.* > FROM company c, company_summary cs > WHERE c.id = cs.id > AND cs.detail = 'test' > ORDER BY cs.fullname; > > Unless I'm missing something, the ORDER BY clause has no effect, but an > EXPLAIN shows it does take extra time, obviously ... Uh, I'd hope it had an effect. Note that RDBMSes have been moving towards allowing fields in ORDER BY that aren't in the SELECT list, though in the past it was common that anything in ORDER BY had to also be in SELECT. -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel@decibel.org Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: