Re: [pgsql-www] Coverity Inspected, 20 bugs detected!

IMHO ... most definitely to both ...


On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Folks,
>
> Sorry to dual-list this, but there's dual aspects to it.
>
> EnterpriseDB, Neil Conway and (earlier) Sean Chittenden worked with
> Coverity to do static code analysis of PostgreSQL.   We came up very clean
> (20 bugs in our 3/4 million lines of code) but part of that was due to
> previous work.   As such, we're now entitled to put a "Coverity Inspected"
> web sticker up on our site somewhere.
>
> So, two questions:
>
> 1) Do we want to put up a Coverity Inspected button?    On the plus side,
> Oracle, MySQL and BerkeleyDB (as well as FreeBSD) have all gone through
> the Coverity checker, so it says good things about our competitiveness to
> other database products.   On the negative side, do we really care?
>
> 2) If we want to put up the button, *where*?   We don't really have a page
> on the web site for "certifications and awards", but maybe we ought to?
>
> --
> --Josh
>
> Josh Berkus
> Aglio Database Solutions
> San Francisco
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>       match
>

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664