Re: Query planner refuses to use index
От | Kilian Hagemann |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Query planner refuses to use index |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200507221046.40339.hagemann1@egs.uct.ac.za обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Query planner refuses to use index (Janning Vygen <vygen@gmx.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Query planner refuses to use index
Re: Query planner refuses to use index |
Список | pgsql-general |
Hi there, Thanks for your and Martijn's comments, I obviously forgot to put in some vital detail: > - You never want to set enable_seq off in production database. That's what I thought... > - did you run "VACUUM ANALYZE speed" lately? Yes, just before I ran all of the queries in my last email. Hence I mentioned increasing default_statistics_target to 50 and reanalysing, which didn't help either. > - what version are you running? 7.4.8, not sure if I'm ready for 8 yet. > - another parameter to look at is random_page_cost: "Sets the planner's > estimate of the cost of a nonsequentially fetched disk page. This is > measured as a multiple of the cost of a sequential page fetch. A higher > value makes it more likely a sequential scan will be used, a lower value > makes it more likely an index scan will be used. The default is four." Hmm, that's interesting. I need to set random_page_cost as low as 0.5 for the index scan's cost to dip below that of the seq_scan. Surely that's a non-realistic setting and not what I want in the long run. Why on earth does the planner in its default configuration so blatantly miss that the index scan is vastly superior? Maybe some more stats about my data will help, a summary is attached. Also, note that set_id is strictly increasing (hence correlation of 1) and rec_time is strictly increasing within records with same set_id. -- Kilian Hagemann Climate Systems Analysis Group University of Cape Town Republic of South Africa Tel(w): ++27 21 650 2748
Вложения
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: