Re: BUG #1756: PQexec eats huge amounts of memory
От | Denis Vlasenko |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #1756: PQexec eats huge amounts of memory |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200507131756.47065.vda@ilport.com.ua обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #1756: PQexec eats huge amounts of memory (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Wednesday 13 July 2005 17:43, Tom Lane wrote: > Denis Vlasenko <vda@ilport.com.ua> writes: > > Consider my posts in this thread as user wish to > > * libpq and network protocol to be changed to allow for incremental reads > > of executed queries and for multiple outstanding result sets, > > or, if above thing looks unsurmountable at the moment, > > * libpq-only change as to allow incremental reads of single outstanding > > result set. Attempt to use pg_numrows, etc, or attempt to execute > > another query forces libpq to read and store all remaining rows > > in client's memory (i.e. current behaviour). > > This isn't going to happen because it would be a fundamental change in > libpq's behavior and would undoubtedly break a lot of applications. > The reason it cannot be done transparently is that you would lose the > guarantee that a query either succeeds or fails: it would be entirely > possible to return some rows to the application and only later get a > failure. > > You can have this behavior today, though, as long as you are willing to > work a little harder at it --- just declare some cursors and then FETCH > in convenient chunks from the cursors. Thanks, I already tried that. It works. -- vda
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: