Re: PL/Python error checking
От | Michael Fuhr |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PL/Python error checking |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050712021324.GA79648@winnie.fuhr.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PL/Python error checking (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: PL/Python error checking
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 12:58:24AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Michael Fuhr wrote: > > The patch is against HEAD but the same changes should be applied > > to earlier versions because they have the same problem. The patch > > might not apply cleanly against earlier versions -- will the committer > > take care of little differences or should I submit different versions > > of the patch? > > I am unclear about backpatching this. We have to weigh the risks of > applying or not applying to 8.0.X. Comments? Since 7.4, PL/Python is only available as an untrusted language, so only a database superuser could create an exploitable function. However, it might be possible for an ordinary user to tickle the bug by calling such a function and passing it certain data, either as an argument or as table data. The code is buggy in any case: PyObject_Str() is documented to return NULL on error, and PyString_AsString() doesn't expect a NULL pointer so it segfaults if passed one. Since the patch simply checks for that condition and raises an error instead of calling a function that will segfault and take down the backend, I can't think of what risk applying the patch would have. The greater risk would seem to be in not applying it. -- Michael Fuhr http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: