Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved

On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 10:39:26AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marko Kreen <marko@l-t.ee> writes:
> > They won't matter on older OpenSSL, as the macros will recast
> > again.  But on 0.9.7e the signature is:
> 
> > void DES_ecb3_encrypt(const unsigned char *input, unsigned char *output,
> >               DES_key_schedule *ks1,DES_key_schedule *ks2,
> >               DES_key_schedule *ks3, int enc);
> 
> > so it seems to me that with your patch the warnings will appear
> > on newer OpenSSL.  (Confirmed)
> 
> Grumble --- you're right.  It's probably not worth ifdef'ing the code to
> suppress the warnings on 0.9.7a ...

Hmmm...in 0.9.8 the signature is back to what it was in 0.9.7[a-d]:

void DES_ecb3_encrypt(const_DES_cblock *input, DES_cblock *output,                     DES_key_schedule
*ks1,DES_key_schedule*ks2,                     DES_key_schedule *ks3, int enc);
 

-- 
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/