Re: Must be owner to truncate?
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Must be owner to truncate? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050708130741.GP24207@ns.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Must be owner to truncate? (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: Must be owner to truncate?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Christopher Kings-Lynne (chriskl@familyhealth.com.au) wrote: > >There are other reasons for restricting it: > > * truncate takes a much stronger lock than a plain delete does. > > * truncate is not MVCC-safe. > > > >I don't really agree with the viewpoint that truncate is just a quick > >DELETE, and so I do not agree that DELETE permissions should be enough > >to let you do a TRUNCATE. > > Ah. I didn't realise that 2nd point. I don't care so much about the > stronger lock in my application. Does truncate not being MVCC-safe cause problems in your situation? It certainly doesn't in mine and I expect the same is true for alot of others in the same situation. Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: