Re: A couple of p.tches for PostgreSQL 64bit support
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A couple of p.tches for PostgreSQL 64bit support |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050708023704.GA29807@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: A couple of patches for PostgreSQL 64bit support (ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: A couple of p.tches for PostgreSQL 64bit support
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 09:38:07AM +0900, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote: > Hans-J|rgen Schvnig <postgres@cybertec.at> wrote: > > > 64-bit XIDs seem to be an overkill - the only practical impact I can see > > is an even larger tuple header (this can be an issue on large boxes too > > - at least compared to Oracle). > > I agreed, too. The changes of XIDs cannot be ignored because the overhead > will be 32bytes per tuple. > > Avoiding overheads, can XIDs/CIDs be different bit length? For example, > can XIDs/CIDs be changed to 48/16-bit or 40/24-bit? Not unless you change the definition of HeapTupleFields (src/include/access/htup.h). Alignment concerns would probably bite you if you changed it, anyway. -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]alvh.no-ip.org>) "Ninguna manada de bestias tiene una voz tan horrible como la humana" (Orual)
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: