Re: getting back autonumber just inserted
| От | Michael Fuhr |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: getting back autonumber just inserted |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20050708014950.GA3339@winnie.fuhr.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: getting back autonumber just inserted (PFC <lists@boutiquenumerique.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: getting back autonumber just inserted
Re: getting back autonumber just inserted |
| Список | pgsql-sql |
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 01:56:26AM +0200, PFC wrote: > >Do you mean with lastval()? Here's what happens: > > Hm, interesting, you mean the return value of lastval() also depends > if you set your constraints to deferred or immediate ? My mind's ablank trying to contrive a situation where that would matter. Can you provide an example? In any case, I simply meant to point out that 8.1's lastval() will be seductively convenient because you don't have to pass it a sequence name, but the value it returns might not be the value you want. -- Michael Fuhr http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: