Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200507070429.j674TKT04852@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to> writes: > > Are you sure about that? That would probably be the normal case, but are > > you promised that the hardware will write all of the sectors of a block > > in order? > > I don't think you can possibly assume that. If the block crosses a > cylinder boundary then it's certainly an unsafe assumption, and even > within a cylinder (no seek required) I'm pretty sure that disk drives > have understood "write the next sector that passes under the heads" > for decades. SCSI tagged queueing certainly allows 512-byte blocks to be reordered during writes. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: