Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
От | Bruno Wolff III |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050707041654.GA14153@wolff.to обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 21:48:44 +0100, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > We could implement the torn-pages option, but that seems a lot of work. > Another way of implementing a tell-tale would be to append the LSN again > as a data page trailer as the last 4 bytes of the page. Thus the LSN > would be both the first and last item on the data page. Any partial > write would fail to update the LSN trailer and we would be able to see > that a page was torn. That's considerably easier than trying to write a > torn page tell-tale to each 512 byte sector of a page as SQLServer does. Are you sure about that? That would probably be the normal case, but are you promised that the hardware will write all of the sectors of a block in order?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: