Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200507011607.29303.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles
Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday 01 July 2005 13:07, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Bruce Momjian (pgman@candle.pha.pa.us) wrote: > > Thanks, TODO updated. We still support CREATE GROUP? It translates to > > roles? > > Yes, <snip> However On Friday 01 July 2005 13:02, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Bruce Momjian (pgman@candle.pha.pa.us) wrote: > > Stupid question, but how do roles relate to our existing "groups"? > > Uhhh. There are no longer "groups", they've been replaced with roles > (which can have members). > Was following this conversation up till now, because these two statement seem to contradict each other. Do we really support groups still, are is CREATE GROUP now syntactical sugar for some for of CREATE ROLE. -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: