Re: COnsidering a move away from Postgres
От | Jason Tesser |
---|---|
Тема | Re: COnsidering a move away from Postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200506301018.16294.jtesser@nbbc.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: COnsidering a move away from Postgres (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: COnsidering a move away from Postgres
Re: COnsidering a move away from Postgres |
Список | pgsql-general |
HI On Thursday 30 June 2005 9:20 am, Tom Lane wrote: > Jason Tesser <jtesser@nbbc.edu> writes: > > 1. Our dev plan involves alot of stored procedures to be used and we have > > found the way this is done in PG to be painful. (ie. To return multiple > > record from different tables you have to define a type. > > FWIW, this won't be essential any more in 8.1. See the examples in the > development documentation: > http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/xfunc-sql.html#XFUNC-OUTPUT-P >ARAMETERS > http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/plpgsql-declarations.html#PLP >GSQL-DECLARATION-ALIASES > http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/plpgsql-control-structures.ht >ml#PLPGSQL-STATEMENTS-RETURNING I might be missing it but how does this help me. What I would like is to be able to return multiple records from a select statement that return multiple columns from different tables without having to create a type. This is why it is painful for us. The management of types is bad because as far as I know there is no alter type and the depencies become a nightmane if you ever need to change something. <snip> -- Jason Tesser Developer for NMI jtesser@nbbc.edu Eph 2:8-10
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: