Re: Occupied port warning
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Occupied port warning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200506281514.30040.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Occupied port warning ("Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Occupied port warning
Re: Occupied port warning Re: Occupied port warning |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > IIRC, in previous versions any bind failure was fatal, but in 8.0 we > decided to be slightly more forgiving and only bail out if we failed > to bind at all. I realize that, but I would like to know where that bright idea came from in violation of all other principles of this and any other software. I recall that it had something to do with IPv6, but I'm not sure. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: