Re: For review: dbsize patch
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: For review: dbsize patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200506272358.j5RNwTu15982@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | For review: dbsize patch ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page wrote: > The attached patch is an update of the dbsize integration patch > discussed last week. This version includes the following functions: > > pg_relation_size(text) - Get relation size by name/schema.name > pg_relation_size(oid) - Get relation size by OID > pg_tablespace_size(name) - Get tablespace size by name > pg_tablespace_size(oid) - Get tablespace size by OID > pg_database_size(name) - Get database size by name > pg_database_size(oid) - Get database size by OID > pg_size_pretty(int8) - Pretty print (and round) the byte size > specified (eg, 123456 = 121KB) > > The only remaining function that last week's brief discussion indicated > was required is a replacement for total_relation_size() (or > pg_table_size() as it might now be called). I didn't realise until a few > minutes ago that this function (which is actually broken because it > doesn't handle schemas) was only committed a couple of months ago (v1.5, > http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/contrib/dbsize/dbsize.s > ql.in) and has therefore never been in a release version. Uh, do any of these include the index size? TOAST size? > So should we include this new feature, and if so, how is it best added - > rewrite in C, or one long line in pg_proc? I would follow whatever we do in pg_proc now. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: