Re: DBSize backend integration

Dave Page wrote:
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us] 
> > Sent: 24 June 2005 20:45
> > To: Dave Page
> > Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] DBSize backend integration
> > 
> > > My personal view is that pg_database_size, pg_relation_size and
> > > pg_tablespace_size, as well as pg_size_pretty should be included. If
> > > others consider that the by name versions are also useful, then they
> > > should be included, but renamed for consistency. The other three
> > > functions should be dropped IMO.
> > 
> > So drop total_relation_size(), relation_size_components(), and what
> > else?
> 
> indexes_size()

What is the logic for removing that?  Because it is an aggregate of all
indexes?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073