Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200506240031.41963.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 11:41, Neil Conway wrote: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > But this doesn't make it easier to use - users don't just include those > > who write it. The antecedent language of these, Ada, from which this > > syntax comes, was explicitly designed to be reader-friendly as opposed to > > writer-friendly, and this is a part of that. > > IMHO it is just needless verbiage that makes programs both harder to > read *and* harder to write, albeit marginally so. I think there is a > reason why Ada-style block terminators are in the minority among > block-structured languages :) > > But obviously this is a matter of taste -- does anyone else like or > dislike the current syntax? > -1 on the proposal to me... ambiguous END statements just looks like trouble to me. I'd actually rather see you implement label...END LOOP label if you felt like you had to change *something*. -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: