Re: default database creation with initdb
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: default database creation with initdb |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200506180927.50411.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: default database creation with initdb (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: default database creation with initdb
Re: default database creation with initdb |
Список | pgsql-patches |
On Saturday 18 June 2005 04:55, Andreas Pflug wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: > > Umm. Tiny item, but your comment still refers to the database as > > pg_system ;-) > > What is the purpose of this database? A generalized, shared resource for tool makers and add-on packages to store information in PostgreSQL, or a working database that is usable (and to be used) out of the box for new users? I really don't think we want the latter... I can see users connecting via psql and then playing around with different add/create type statements. It is all too common a question from newbies... "does postgresql have a default database to get started with?" They'll see this database and begin creating schema and using this as thier main database, and I think we ought to avoid that. If people don't like pg_system, pg_addons seem like a much safer name to go with imho. -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: