Re: Autovacuum in the backend
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Autovacuum in the backend |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050616042743.GA14678@surnet.cl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Autovacuum in the backend (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Autovacuum in the backend
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 02:09:47PM +1000, Neil Conway wrote: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >One issue I do have to deal with right now is how many autovacuum > >processes do we want to be running. The current approach is to have one > >autovacuum process. Two possible options would be to have one per > >database, and one per tablespace. What do people think? > > Why do we need more than one pg_autovacuum process? The only reason I considered it is because you can use the regular catalog-management routines to handle the new pg_autovacuum system catalog. With a single process, we need to issue SQL queries. This is very ugly IMHO. -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]surnet.cl>) "Tiene valor aquel que admite que es un cobarde" (Fernandel)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: