Re: Conventions for release numbering
От | elein@varlena.com (elein) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Conventions for release numbering |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050613023818.GW17206@varlena.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Conventions for release numbering ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Conventions for release numbering
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 11:13:15PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Sun, 12 Jun 2005, elein wrote: > > >(No, wait, I'm not starting a release numbering discussion.) > > > > > >If we have release 8.0.3 where 8 is the Major releae, > >0 is the minor release and 3 is the version (revision?), > >how would we refer to a generic release number: > > > > postgresql-M.m.v ? postgresql-M.m.r ? > > > >Is this our convention? Do either of these work? > > Assuming v==version and r==release, is there a big difference between the > two? How are each defined? That is my question! What do we conventionally use? > > > ---- > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) > Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 >
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: