Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths?
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050607214758.K34152@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths? (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Josh Berkus wrote: > Marc, > >> Personally, we shoudl accept the .Org booth regardless of whether the >> Commercial one is setup ... if we *don't*, the offer may not be made >> next year, since we obviously didn't need it ... > > Or we'll piss off O'Reilly by askign for a booth we don't need. Remember > that the .ORG booths are at *their* cost. Just a thought ... SRA/CP are willing to put together a booth that, as far as I've read, is meant for the .ORG ... why not accept the .Org booth itself, and use the money saved from the booth cost for other expenses? I don't know how much the booth space itself costs, so not sure how much of a different it would make, but, for instance, maybe the 'cost of the booth itself' could be used (assuming it is allowed) to get a "big blue elephant ballon" made that either floats (or hangs) over the booth so that you see if from a distance, even if you aren't right beside the booth ... or something like that? Instead of two booths, have one, but make it much more visible ... ? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: